Abstrakt
Performance of various materials such as activated carbons, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, and alu- minosilicate for aquatic adsorption of micropollutants has been compared. Micropollutants (bis- phenol A (BPA) and nonylphenol (NP)) were removed from artificial effluent which was spiked with standards of those chemicals. It was found that nonylphenol was more favorable adsorbed by all the sorbents than BPA. The higher adsorption capacities for BPA and NP showed single walled carbon nanotubes and activated carbon (AKPA). Slightly lower removal efficiencies of the studied micropol-lutants were observed for the multi-walled carbon nanotubes and activated carbon SX2. Taking into account the porous structure of the sorbents, it can be concluded that the materials containing meso- pores had lower sorption capacities for BPA and NP than materials with microporous structure. Ad-sorption of micropollutants was much quicker for the carbon nanotubes than for the activated carbon.
| Język oryginału | angielski |
|---|---|
| Strony (od–do) | 161-178 |
| Liczba stron | 18 |
| Czasopismo | Environment Protection Engineering |
| Tom | 42 |
| Numer wydania | 4 |
| Identyfikatory DOI | |
| Status publikacji | Opublikowano - 2016 |
Cele SDG ONZ
Ten wynik przyczynia się do realizacji następujących celów zrównoważonego rozwoju
-
Cel 6 Czysta woda i higiena
Obszary tematyczne ASJC Scopus
- Inżynieria środowiska
- Gospodarka i usuwanie odpadów
Fingerprint
Zanurz się w tematy badawcze publikacji „Potential of various materials for adsorption of micropollutants from wastewater”. Razem tworzą niepowtarzalny odcisk palca.Cytowanie
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver