A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting

M. Rabasová; Z. Korban; O. Pavlík

doi:10.1201/9781315210469-368

A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting

M. Rabasová
, Z. Korban
, O. Pavlík

Katedra Inżynierii Bezpieczeństwa (RG/RG3)

VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava
Vítkovice Hospital

Wyniki badań: Rozdział w książce/raport/materiał konferencyjny › Wkład w konferencję › recenzja

Abstrakt

Stroke—the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries, is very frequently caused by carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an endovascular surgery where a stent (a tube-like metalic mesh) is deployed within the lumen of the affected artery to dilate it and prevent a stroke. Two types of embolic protection devices are commonly used during CAS—distal protection devices (filters) and proximal protection devices. The aim of this single-center, randomized, prospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy of distal protection devices and proximal protection devices during CAS. Statistical analysis was carried out with the programs SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann-Whitney test, x ² test and Fisher’s exact test were used and the value of p = 0.05 was taken as a level of significance.

Język oryginału	angielski
Tytuł publikacji goszczącej	Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017
Redaktorzy	Marko Cepin, Radim Briš
Wydawca	CRC Press/Balkema
Strony	2901-2905
Liczba stron	5
ISBN (drukowany)	9781138629370
Identyfikatory DOI	https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210469-368
Status publikacji	Opublikowano - 2017
Wydarzenie	27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017 - Portorož, Słowenia Czas trwania: 18 cze 2017 → 22 cze 2017

Seria publikacji

Nazwa	Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017

Konferencja

Konferencja	27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017
Kraj/Terytorium	Słowenia
Miejscowość	Portorož
Okres	18/06/17 → 22/06/17

Cele SDG ONZ

Ten wynik przyczynia się do realizacji następujących celów zrównoważonego rozwoju

Cel 3 Dobre zdrowie i dobre samopoczucie

Obszary tematyczne ASJC Scopus

Bezpieczeństwo, ryzyko, niezawodność i jakość

Uzyskaj dostęp do dokumentu

10.1201/9781315210469-368

Inne pliki i linki

Link do publikacji w Scopus

Cytowanie

Rabasová, M., Korban, Z., & Pavlík, O. (2017). A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting. W M. Cepin, & R. Briš (Red.), Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017 (str. 2901-2905). (Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017). CRC Press/Balkema. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210469-368

Rabasová, M. ; Korban, Z. ; Pavlík, O. / A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting. Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. redaktor / Marko Cepin ; Radim Briš. CRC Press/Balkema, 2017. str. 2901-2905 (Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017).

@inproceedings{2dca2bfacbc140feb902f741aed7fc4e,

title = "A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting",

abstract = " Stroke{\textemdash}the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries, is very frequently caused by carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an endovascular surgery where a stent (a tube-like metalic mesh) is deployed within the lumen of the affected artery to dilate it and prevent a stroke. Two types of embolic protection devices are commonly used during CAS{\textemdash}distal protection devices (filters) and proximal protection devices. The aim of this single-center, randomized, prospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy of distal protection devices and proximal protection devices during CAS. Statistical analysis was carried out with the programs SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann-Whitney test, x 2 test and Fisher{\textquoteright}s exact test were used and the value of p = 0.05 was taken as a level of significance.",

author = "M. Rabasov{\'a} and Z. Korban and O. Pavl{\'i}k",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Taylor \& Francis Group, London.; 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017 ; Conference date: 18-06-2017 Through 22-06-2017",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1201/9781315210469-368",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781138629370",

series = "Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017",

publisher = "CRC Press/Balkema",

pages = "2901--2905",

editor = "Marko Cepin and Radim Bri{\v s}",

booktitle = "Safety and Reliability {\textendash} Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017",

}

Rabasová, M, Korban, Z & Pavlík, O 2017, A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting. w M Cepin & R Briš (red), Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017, CRC Press/Balkema, str. 2901-2905, 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017, Portorož, Słowenia, 18/06/17. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210469-368

A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting. / Rabasová, M.; Korban, Z.; Pavlík, O.
Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. red. / Marko Cepin; Radim Briš. CRC Press/Balkema, 2017. str. 2901-2905 (Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017).

Wyniki badań: Rozdział w książce/raport/materiał konferencyjny › Wkład w konferencję › recenzja

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting

AU - Rabasová, M.

AU - Korban, Z.

AU - Pavlík, O.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Stroke—the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries, is very frequently caused by carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an endovascular surgery where a stent (a tube-like metalic mesh) is deployed within the lumen of the affected artery to dilate it and prevent a stroke. Two types of embolic protection devices are commonly used during CAS—distal protection devices (filters) and proximal protection devices. The aim of this single-center, randomized, prospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy of distal protection devices and proximal protection devices during CAS. Statistical analysis was carried out with the programs SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann-Whitney test, x 2 test and Fisher’s exact test were used and the value of p = 0.05 was taken as a level of significance.

AB - Stroke—the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries, is very frequently caused by carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an endovascular surgery where a stent (a tube-like metalic mesh) is deployed within the lumen of the affected artery to dilate it and prevent a stroke. Two types of embolic protection devices are commonly used during CAS—distal protection devices (filters) and proximal protection devices. The aim of this single-center, randomized, prospective study was to compare the safety and efficacy of distal protection devices and proximal protection devices during CAS. Statistical analysis was carried out with the programs SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Mann-Whitney test, x 2 test and Fisher’s exact test were used and the value of p = 0.05 was taken as a level of significance.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85061368450

U2 - 10.1201/9781315210469-368

DO - 10.1201/9781315210469-368

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85061368450

SN - 9781138629370

T3 - Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017

SP - 2901

EP - 2905

BT - Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017

A2 - Cepin, Marko

A2 - Briš, Radim

PB - CRC Press/Balkema

T2 - 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017

Y2 - 18 June 2017 through 22 June 2017

ER -

Rabasová M, Korban Z, Pavlík O. A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting. W Cepin M, Briš R, redaktorzy, Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. CRC Press/Balkema. 2017. str. 2901-2905. (Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017). doi: 10.1201/9781315210469-368

A comparison of safety and efficiency of protection systems in carotid artery stenting

Abstrakt

Seria publikacji

Konferencja

Cele SDG ONZ

Obszary tematyczne ASJC Scopus

Uzyskaj dostęp do dokumentu

Inne pliki i linki

Fingerprint

Cytowanie