Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to assess and compare three hybrid systems for the production of synthetic natural gas (biomethane) from biogas or process gas. Mathematical models were built to determine the main performance indicators and plant efficiency of the proposed solutions, such as mass and energy flows and gas composition in characteristic points of the systems, as well as the efficiencies of the full chains. The carbon footprint of the three approaches was calculated using a streamlined life cycle assessment. The results show that both methanation cases may be an interesting option for SNG production and energy storage. The energy efficiency of the solutions reaches a value of 84% for Case 1 (methanation from syngas) and 90% for Case 2 (methanation of biogas) and 3 (biogas upgrading), respectively. If the manure credit is accounted for emissions, the carbon footprint of biomethane from Case 3 is the lowest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3284-3293 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Jan 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Biogas upgrading
- Biomethane
- Membranes
- Methanation
- Synthetic natural gas
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Fuel Technology
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Thermodynamic and environmental study on synthetic natural gas production in power to gas approaches involving biomass gasification and anaerobic digestion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver