Abstract
In the paper a survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done in order to evaluate how the ability of prediction of reliability characteristics influences over robustness criteria. The most important reliability characteristics are: Mean Time to Failure, Mean Time of Repair. Survey analysis is done for a job shop scheduling problem. The paper answers the question: what method generates robust schedules in the case of a bottleneck failure occurrence before, at the beginning of planned maintenance actions or after planned maintenance actions? Efficiency of predictive schedules is evaluated using criteria: makespan, total tardiness, flow time, idle time. Efficiency of reactive schedules is evaluated using: solution robustness criterion and quality robustness criterion. This paper is the continuation of the research conducted in the paper [1], where the survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done only for small size scheduling problems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 042019 |
| Journal | IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering |
| Volume | 145 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Aug 2016 |
| Event | 4th International Conference on Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering, ModTech 2016 - Iasi, Romania Duration: 15 Jun 2016 → 18 Jun 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Materials Science
- General Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The comparison of predictive scheduling algorithms for different sizes of job shop scheduling problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver