Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Students' attitude to formative web-based assessment

  • Silesian University of Technology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Internet-based assessment has been recently introduced into many courses taught at Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. We have started with summative assessment (examination) and non-obligatory formative assessment. The next step was the implementation of obligatory formative assessment for some groups of students. In the paper the applied forms of formative assessment are thoroughly described. We present the method, obtained results, and students attitude to different forms of assessment. Students have been surveyed on various aspects of web-based assessment - in particular, on the methods of cheating. We discuss the range of cheating, ways of cheating and precautions to be taken. The authors' experience and findings may be helpful for teachers applying Internet for students' assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 7th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, WBE 2008
Pages139-144
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Event7th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, WBE 2008 - Innsbruck, Austria
Duration: 17 Mar 200819 Mar 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 7th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, WBE 2008

Conference

Conference7th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, WBE 2008
Country/TerritoryAustria
CityInnsbruck
Period17/03/0819/03/08

Keywords

  • E-learning
  • Multi-choice test
  • Summative and formative assessment
  • Web-based assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Students' attitude to formative web-based assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this