Abstract
The problem of computing the range y of a gven function f(x1; : : : ; xn) over given intervals xi - often called the main problem of interval com-putations - is, in general, NP-hard. This means that unless P = NP, it is not possible to have a feasible (= polynomial time) algorithm that always computes the desired range. Instead, interval computations al-gorithms compute an enclosure Y ⊇ y for the desired range. For all known feasible enclosure-computing methods - starting with straightfor-ward interval computations - there exist two expressions f(x1; : : : ; x n) and g(x1; : : : ; xN) for computing the same function that lead to different enclosures. We prove that, unless P = N, this is inevitable: it is not pos-sible to have a feasible enclosure-computing method which is independent of the equivalent form.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1 |
| Journal | Reliable Computing |
| Volume | 18 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2013 |
Keywords
- Enclosure
- Equivalent form
- Interval computations
- NP-hard
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Computational Mathematics
- Applied Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is it possible to have a feasible enclosure-computing method which is independent of the equivalent form?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver