Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is it possible to have a feasible enclosure-computing method which is independent of the equivalent form?

  • University of Texas at El Paso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The problem of computing the range y of a gven function f(x1; : : : ; xn) over given intervals xi - often called the main problem of interval com-putations - is, in general, NP-hard. This means that unless P = NP, it is not possible to have a feasible (= polynomial time) algorithm that always computes the desired range. Instead, interval computations al-gorithms compute an enclosure Y ⊇ y for the desired range. For all known feasible enclosure-computing methods - starting with straightfor-ward interval computations - there exist two expressions f(x1; : : : ; x n) and g(x1; : : : ; xN) for computing the same function that lead to different enclosures. We prove that, unless P = N, this is inevitable: it is not pos-sible to have a feasible enclosure-computing method which is independent of the equivalent form.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1
JournalReliable Computing
Volume18
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Enclosure
  • Equivalent form
  • Interval computations
  • NP-hard

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Computational Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it possible to have a feasible enclosure-computing method which is independent of the equivalent form?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this