Abstract
Different methods for tunnel identification, geometry-based and small-molecule tracking approaches, were compared to provide their benefits and pitfalls. Results obtained for both crystal structures and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were analyzed to investigate if a more computationally demanding method would be beneficial. Careful examination of the results is essential for the low-diameter tunnel description, and assessment of the tunnel functionality based only on their geometrical parameters is challenging. We showed that the small-molecule tracking approach can provide a detailed description of the system; however, it can also be the most computationally demanding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6803-6811 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 24 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Dec 2022 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
- General Chemical Engineering
- Computer Science Applications
- Library and Information Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Geometry-Based versus Small-Molecule Tracking Method for Tunnel Identification: Benefits and Pitfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver