TY - GEN
T1 - Feedback supervising feedforward Minimum-Variance Control of acoustic noise
AU - Pawelczyk, Marek
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Minimum-Variance Control is one of the dominating strategies for actively suppressing acoustic noise. Feedforward structure is generally preferred if a reference signal is available. Otherwise, feedback structure is the interim solution. The purpose of this paper is to design an optimal combined control-weighted minimum variance noise control system. In the proposed approach feedforward is the primary control strategy. Feedback control is added to the already operating feedforward. It aims at controlling the residual noise of feedforward control. However, the main purpose of closing the external loop is to benefit from properties of feedback control. Appropriate controllers can be designed in the time domain, frequency domain or transform domain. The latter approach, based on polynomial operations, including Diophantine equations has been chosen. Correctly applied control weighting for both techniques guarantees stable operation for a non-minimum phase plant. Performance of the combined system is compared to performance of the individually operating feedforward system. Different time dependences are considered. Theoretical analysis is supported by simulation experiments based on data obtained from a real-world active headrest system.
AB - Minimum-Variance Control is one of the dominating strategies for actively suppressing acoustic noise. Feedforward structure is generally preferred if a reference signal is available. Otherwise, feedback structure is the interim solution. The purpose of this paper is to design an optimal combined control-weighted minimum variance noise control system. In the proposed approach feedforward is the primary control strategy. Feedback control is added to the already operating feedforward. It aims at controlling the residual noise of feedforward control. However, the main purpose of closing the external loop is to benefit from properties of feedback control. Appropriate controllers can be designed in the time domain, frequency domain or transform domain. The latter approach, based on polynomial operations, including Diophantine equations has been chosen. Correctly applied control weighting for both techniques guarantees stable operation for a non-minimum phase plant. Performance of the combined system is compared to performance of the individually operating feedforward system. Different time dependences are considered. Theoretical analysis is supported by simulation experiments based on data obtained from a real-world active headrest system.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84881442979
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84881442979
SN - 9781627480000
T3 - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
SP - 1122
EP - 1129
BT - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
T2 - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
Y2 - 9 July 2007 through 12 July 2007
ER -