Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of Quality of Innovative E-Learning in Higher Education: An Insight from Poland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of research on the quality of e-learning in Polish higher education. The authors used an internet questionnaire for the study. The research sample was 621 students. Firstly, the researchers determined 14 variables that are important for the quality of e-learning. Then the students evaluated these variables with scores from 1 to 5. The students agreed the most with the following statements: “using the e-learning platform is convenient” (average: 4.20 and median 5.00), and “logging in to the e-learning platform is easy” (average 4.38, median 5.00). Moreover, the authors studied the relation between the quality of e-learning in Polish universities and the following variables: the ease with which the student can acquire content in traditional teaching and e-learning, the student’s knowledge of information technology and their possession of the resources necessary for e-learning, and the student’s assessment of the innovation of e-learning solutions used by the university where the student studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109
JournalApplied System Innovation
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • e-learning
  • innovative education
  • quality
  • study resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Information Systems
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Quality of Innovative E-Learning in Higher Education: An Insight from Poland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this