Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of avoiding collision with an object in motion – Virtual reality technology in diagnostic and training from perspective of prophylactic of body injuries

  • Silesian University of Technology
  • Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa
  • Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aim: People older than 60 years, with dysfunctions of musculoskeletal or motor system, impaired vision or hearing etc. are in a group of higher risk of collisions with objects in motion, which suddenly are heading towards their body (cyclists, runners, thrown an object, intentional punch or kick etc.). This study aims to verify compensation possibilities of this category of threats by a person who is cumulating a few factors of higher risk of collision with an object in motion heading toward his head, but on the other hand, having a longstanding adaptation for this kind of threats. Material and Methods: Two men have been subjected to the study: a man A 68-years-old and man B 27-years-old. Measurements have been performed with the use of MVN Biomech System (XSENS). Application projects a ball with a diameter of 12 cm, which fly with constant velocity (three trials; 10-, 6-and 3 m/s) alongside axis perpendicular to a frontal plane on the height the head and legs of the participant in an initial moment. Results: Man B avoided collision head with an object in motion three times. Man A avoided it only with a velocity of 3 m/s. Mean time of reaction of man A was 0.407 ±0.27s and was 35% longer than man B (0.263 ±0.05s). Man A performed body rotation faster (0.870 ±0.636s) than B (1.133 ±0.054s); moves his centre of mass more efficiently in the frontal plane (5.953 ±0.034deg) and sagittal plane (6.185 ±0.959deg) than man B (9.825 ±2.909deg) and (13.001 ±0.451deg). Man A managed to avoid collision with a ball with a diameter of 12 cm for the left knee at the highest velocity (10 m/s). Man B did not avoid collision nor for the left or right knee in the same circumstances. Kinematic trajectory for following velocities registered for 27 years old man differs significantly. Conclusion: Positive adaptation effects for 68 years old man (most of the analysed time graphs of kinematics quantities were similar) is an empiric proof, that some category of “life sports” guarantee an optimal level of motor safety to a late elderly. Furthermore, adequately adapted virtual reality technology could be an effective and attractive tool for enhancing training of avoiding collisions on small space (in the apartment, garage etc.) despite weather or other circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-210
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Budo
Volume13
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Health-related training
  • Life sports
  • Martial arts
  • Motor safety
  • Prophylactic and therapeutic agonology
  • Safe fall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of avoiding collision with an object in motion – Virtual reality technology in diagnostic and training from perspective of prophylactic of body injuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this