Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-border impact of agricultural fertilizer use: Environmental spillovers and healthcare costs in European countries

  • Aleksandra Kuzior
  • , Stanislav Vasylishyn
  • , Vladyslav Hrei
  • , Maksym Huzenko
  • , Olena Akymenko
  • , Oleksii Solohub
  • , Tetiana Vasylieva
  • National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
  • Interregional Academy of Personnel Management
  • Sumy State University
  • Chernihiv National University of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study empirically examines the cross-border environmental and health impacts of mineral fertilizer use in European countries by applying spatial panel models. Specifically, it evaluates how nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers affect public health expenditures and water quality within national borders and adjacent countries. To accurately capture transboundary influences, the analysis uses a spatial weights matrix based on shared land borders constructed from geospatial data (Natural Earth shape-files), enabling the assessment of spillover effects between neighboring countries. The models cover the timespan 2006-2021 for 29 European nations, except those that do not have common land borders (island countries), with available and comparable data. The results confirm significant spatial effects. The spatial lag model revealed strong direct and spillover effects for health expenditure, particularly for nitrogen and pesticide use, indicating that increased agricultural intensity in one country can raise health costs in neighboring states. Phosphate and potash use were associated with reductions in health expenditure, though the interpretation may reflect regional differences in environmental management. In contrast, the spatial error model best explained unsafe drinking water outcomes, highlighting the role of unobserved, spatially correlated environmental pressures. Nitrogen and pesticide use were linked to increased water contamination, while phosphate showed a strong but context-dependent negative association.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-103
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Economics
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  3. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  4. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  5. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  6. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • cross-border pollution
  • healthcare expenditures
  • mineral fertilizers
  • sustainable agriculture
  • sustainable development policies
  • sustainable water management
  • water resource safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-border impact of agricultural fertilizer use: Environmental spillovers and healthcare costs in European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this