Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Averaging of nonlinearly aligned signal cycles for noise suppression

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Averaging of nonlinearly aligned (time-warped) signal cycles is an important method for suppressing noise of quasi-periodical or event related signals. However, in the paper we show that the operation of time warping introduces unfavorable violation of the requirements that should be satisfied for effective averaging and, as a result, it causes poor suppression of noise. To limit these effects, we redefine the matrix of the alignment costs. To improve results of averaging in cases of variable energy noise, we apply weighting of the summed signal samples. The derived formula gives smaller weights for more noisy signal cycles and this way limits their influence on the constructed template. The proposed modifications caused a significant increase of the Noise Reduction Factor (NRF) in the experiments on the simulated evoked potentials. Whereas the greatest NRF obtained by the reference methods in nonstationary white noise environment was equal to 1.55, for the new method proposed we achieved a value of 4.44. For non-stationary colored noise, the corresponding values were 1.44 and 2.99. Moreover, application of the developed method to ECG signal processing, prior to the measurements of the QT interval, significantly improved the measurements immunity to noise.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-168
Number of pages12
JournalBiomedical Signal Processing and Control
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2015

Keywords

  • Dynamic time warping
  • ECG signal
  • Event-related potentials
  • Evoked potentials
  • Noise suppression
  • Nonlinear alignment
  • QT interval

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Signal Processing
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Averaging of nonlinearly aligned signal cycles for noise suppression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this