Abstract
In this article, we present experiments aimed to identify a suitable compression algorithm for colour retina images (Schaefer & Starosolski, 2006). Such an algorithm, in order to prove useful in a real-life PACS, should not only reduce the file size of the images significantly but also has to be fast enough, both for compression and decompression. Furthermore, it should be covered by international standards such as ISO standards and, in particular for medical imaging, the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard (Mildenberger, Eichelberg, & Martin, 2002; National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2004). For our study, we therefore selected those compression algorithms that are supported in DICOM, namely TIFF PackBits (Adobe Systems Inc., 1995), Lossless JPEG (Langdon, Gulati, & Seiler, 1992), JPEG-LS (ISO/IEC, 1999), and JPEG2000 (ISO/IEC, 2002). For comparison, we also included CALIC (Wu, 1997), which is often employed for benchmarking compression algorithms. All algorithms were evaluated in terms of compression ratio which describes the reduction of file size and speed. For speed, we consider both the time it takes to encode an image (compression speed) and to decode (decompression speed), as both are relevant within a PACS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Encyclopedia of Healthcare Information Systems |
| Subtitle of host publication | Volume 1-3 |
| Publisher | IGI Global |
| Pages | 238-243 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Volume | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781599048901 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781599048895 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2008 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
- General Medicine
- General Health Professions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Lossless Image Compression Algorithms for Colour Retina Images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver